Sunday, April 22, 2012

Kat Forbes - Choice Topic #3


Lewis on Jane and Mark as a married couple
Entry #9 (Choice Topic #3)
Katherine Forbes
            In That Hideous Strength of The Space Trilogy, Mark and Jane are both the subjects of a thorough case study on the vulnerability of men to, for lack of a better term, herd behavior.  Both seek out a role in the social hierarchy; they want, not only to be a part of the “in-crowd”, but to be recognized as so.  Yet there is a distinctive difference between the very cores of their characters which sets them apart so powerfully, and results in a dramatic difference in their vulnerability to the temptations they are faced with. 
Jane wants to be seen as a woman married to a man of power and high social standing, while also being seen as independent, intelligent, and respect-worthy individual.  Notice, she doesn’t have nearly as great of concern for these dignities when she is on her own, but rather emphasizes these attributes when in a social setting.  For example when she meets Miss Ironwood she swells with pride upon being able to say Mark has obtained a position with N.I.C.E.  Furthermore, one of the reasons she is so hesitant to become involved with the Dimbles, despite their kindness and friendliness, is that she views their open Christianity to make them somehow “unpopular”, not the socialites she would prefer to associate with.  Notice also that one of the reasons she eventually returns to St. Annes is because she cannot find a socialite companion to replace Mrs. Maggs with whom she can “go out in the town”, and the Dennistons are so ideal to lure her in to meet Dr. Ransom, being socially graceful and characteristic of her socialite ideal.  Yet Jane also overcomes these impulses fairly early in the story, and we know based on the guilt Mark feels when he thinks about her that she does have a more sturdy sense of character than he. She also comes to stand on her own two feet, entirely independent of Mark, placing faith in Dr. Ransom alone.  Based on a mere encounter with him, she comes to change herself, and undergoes an intermediary stage where she develops an individual, independent identity. 
Mark, conversely, is far more vulnerable to his desires of being “included” in the “in-crowd”, a desire which noticeably never dies, but rather shifts focus.  He never has a phase when he stands on his own two feet and develops strength of morality and character (although he does develop a powerful resolve and an understanding of truth).  He does not have a time as Jane does (when she sets out for home and is interrogated by Hardcastle) where he is able to develop an identity independent of a desired team, but rather defines himself by whatever team he views to be best.  Just after he has been arrested and he is undergoing his transformation, he realizes that he “joined the wrong group,” and desires instead to be with Jane’s “in crowd.”  Personally, I found this development in Mark quite disappointing.  Furthermore, while Jane constantly questions every new piece of information presented to her and thinks deeply about whether she should go along with something, Mark fails to be so analytically engaged.  Many, many times throughout the story “the moment of his consent almost escaped his notice” and on page 127 this results in his almost subconscious submission to NICE “it all slipped past in a chatter of laughter, of that intimate laughter between fellow professionals, which of all earthly powers is strongest to make men do very bad things before they are yet, individually, very bad men.”  Compared to Jane’s over-active defensiveness, Mark comes across as a total pushover, and this likely accounts for his inability to recognize the truth sooner.    

No comments:

Post a Comment