Gabrielle Hunt
19 April 2012
Outside Reading 4
Shame-Faced Love
“I doubt we ever catch Affection beginning,” Lewis says of his
first type of love. Affection is the love between a child and a parent, the
love for a coworker, the love for the neighbor you wave at when you pick up
your mail in the morning. “To become aware of it is to become aware that it has
already been going on for some time.” This kind of loves requires only
familiarity. A person who orders their coffee from the same barista each
morning might have this sort of love for that barista, as the barista may have
in return for their repeat customers.
I was attracted to his use of the phrase “shame-faced,” implying
that Affection is the type of love that we most often will not admit to. He
used a humorous example of a dog secretly being fond of a cat, yet being unable
to tell his fellow canines, but I could think of many personal illustrations of
this concept. With this possibility in mind as I continued reading, I was
slightly surprised when, in the midst of his list of perpetrators of Affection,
he used fellow churchgoers as an example. This should hypothetically be
irreconcilable, the combination of shame-faced love and the church family.
Automatic piety initially prevents me from admitting to the possibility that
the two could be combined…but they are paired far more often than any of us
would like to admit. The books of Corinthians would not like us to describe
love as shame-faced, especially when the object of our affection is our brother
in Christ.
We must step away from that selfish sense of shame in order to learn
a lesson about unselfish love; when we can admit to our affection for the
lesser-liked participants in our everyday lives, and describe them as being
likeable “in their own way,” we are accepting ways of being likeable that are
different than those we feel that affection should come from. “We are learning to appreciate goodness or
intelligence in themselves, not merely goodness or intelligence flavoured and
served to suit our own palate.”
No comments:
Post a Comment