Eric Fesmire-Outside Reading Post 2

Narrative rationality is part of a common debate in theological circles today. The argument between the systematic theology school and narrative theology school is becoming more and more prevalent even as scholars seek to close the gap. The main argument revolves around which mode of theology is better equipped to tackle the Bible. Below is an excerpt from Classic Christianity: A Systematic Theology.

"Biblical history resists systematization. Yet since the Bible wishes to address each hearer as a whole person, it invites and requires that each believer seek to bring its loose ends to together, to listen for its unity, and to try to see it integrally."

Thomas C. Oden is admitting that his task is an impossible one because of the inherent narrative nature of history. Earlier he states that one can laugh (in joy) at each page due to the ironic nature of man trying to fully, systematically understand God. I agree with Oden on this point. While narratives are powerful tools and should be used readily and often, some things require more systematic thought. Systematic thinkers must be willing to admit, like Oden, that what they are doing is moving against the grain to bring understanding. Some things cannot always be placed in neat boxes. God can only be understood as far as he has revealed Himself. After that, a human, by definition, must stand in awe of something or someone Other.