How do we come to know anything? Do logic and reason
have exclusivity? Is it possible to critique another’s experience? These are
only a few of the questions which we pondered over for our first meeting at the
Hilton Tavern. By perusing through the various fields within philosophy, we
discussed issues of epistemology (the study of knowledge, “knowing”, truth),
ontology (the study of being, existence, metaphysics, reality), and axiology
(the study of meaning, values, morals, ethics, aesthetics). Likewise, we
recognized the tendency for bias (the winner of the war writes the history
books) and the inability to step outside our humanity. We are stuck in history;
and yet nature is not what is real. Nature is a human construct, according to
John Batista Vico. Thus there remains a tendency to be stuck inside solipsism—the
idea that your reality is the only one which exists and free from the possible existence
of others. History, then, is the story
of clearing—making a path to reach truth. But what is truth? Can it ever be
reached? Is there a difference between Truth and truth? Is there more than one
T/truth? Such questions seem to revolve solely within the realm of the
philosopher. However, the unlikely poet also has much to say. While Plato
dismissed artists and poets as liars and distorters of truth, a poet’s
perspective can be interpreted as truth viewed with, a different lens. Poets
and philosophers provide unique, if not conflicting, accounts of the world and
its inhabitants. In light of the author, C.S. Lewis can be thought of both as a
philosopher as well as a poet—weaving elaborate tales which contain puzzling
and challenging questions about the human condition.
No comments:
Post a Comment